Despite the presidential directives on the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) to suspend immediately, the implementation of the controversial Cyber security levy, the nation’s apex bank has continued to receive knocks for putting up the idea in the first place
This is even as presidency sources have insisted that the levy was not a directive from president Bola Tinubu, but emanated from the Office of National Security Adviser (ONSA)
Declaring the proposed levy unconditional, two Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SAN) Olisa Agbakoba and Femi Falana have vowed to challenge the implementation in court.
Recall that the CBN had in a circular on May 6, directed financial institutions to commence implementation of 0.5 percent cybersecurity levy on all electronic transactions.
The apex bank while defending it’s decision, said, the levy, which is to be administered by the Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA), is contained in section 44 of Nigeria’s Cybercrime (Prohibition, Prevention, Etc) Amendment Act 2024.
Speaking with TheCable, Agbakoba said the imposition of the levy is unconstitutional and not a “good idea”.
“It is not a good idea at all. I believe it is a good idea to have a cybersecurity act so that we can deal with cybercrime. However, it is not a good idea to create a fund for which the national security adviser will be entitled to deploy when that is contrary to what the constitution prescribes,” he said.
“So, I am going to court to challenge the imposition by the CBN on levies on the banks which will amount to the banks paying about N3 trillion a year.
“That is unconstitutional because what the constitution says is that everything concerning revenue, whether it is tax or non-tax revenue such as the levy in the cybersecurity act, must pass through the federation account for it to now be appropriated by the national assembly.
“So, if the same national assembly makes a law bypassing the appropriation process and putting money in the hands of an agency, that is unconstitutional.”
Agbakoba says the federal government is always broke because most of the ministries, departments and agencies (MDAs) are appropriating and disbursing to themselves monies that should go into the federation account.
“It goes back to when Nigeria was always having a deficit budget. Many of the MDAs bypass the federation account and collect monies directly. The number one culprit is the Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC).
“The NNPC collects so much trillions and then spends so much trillions and then gives pocket money to the federal government. That is very wrong.
“Section 162 of the constitution says that every resource of the federal government must be paid into the federation account before it is disbursed. So, the NNPC is spending money without the appropriation of the national assembly.
“The cybersecurity fund will be spent without the national assembly’s appropriation. It is a sorry thing that the very national assembly that should understand that all revenue must pass through the federation account, are the ones passing laws bypassing the process
“We talk of Nigeria being poor, whereas, we have over 300 agencies in Nigeria appropriating monies to themselves. Nigeria customs does that, the same with NIMASA, TETFUND, Police Fund, ETF and others.
“That is why the federal government is broke because these agencies are taking all the money. The government sits down waiting for money to come but the agencies have taken everything.
“It is something that I think ought to be challenged because the federal government is now dispossessed of revenue that can be used to build roads, bridges, schools, hospitals and create employment. Very few agencies take 80 percent of our money.
“So, I am happy that this has happened because it gives me an opportunity to present a case before a judge to say every revenue that is meant for the federation must go through the federation account.
“It can’t be disbursed by the national assembly or the state house of assembly at the state level without the appropriate constitutional process which is prescribed in section 162.
“If the court agrees with me, it will immediately dismantle this cybersecurity levy. It will immediately declare what the CBN wants to do as unconstitutional.”
“That is why the federal government is broke because these agencies are taking all the money. The government sits down waiting for money to come but the agencies have taken everything.
“It is something that I think ought to be challenged because the federal government is now dispossessed of revenue that can be used to build roads, bridges, schools, hospitals and create employment. Very few agencies take 80 percent of our money.”
