Connect with us

Editorial

King’s College Debacle: The ‘If’ questions must be answered

Published

on

King’s College, Lagos, turned 117 years yesterday, Sunday, September 20, 2026. Naturally, it should be a moment of celebration for one of Nigeria’s most historic educational institutions. Instead, the anniversary has become a painful reminder of how quickly an education policy can become a national crisis when consultation, transparency and trust are sacrificed.

Founded in 1909, King’s College has produced generations of Nigerians who have contributed to virtually every sphere of national life. Its sister institution, Queen’s College, and the network of Federal Unity Colleges were created around a larger national idea: that education should bring Nigerian children together across ethnic, regional, religious and social boundaries.

It is therefore deeply disturbing that, as King’s College marks 117 years, the institution has become the centre of a dispute that has disrupted the reopening of Federal Unity Colleges across the country.

The immediate dispute concerns the Federal Government’s concession of the management of King’s College to the King’s College Old Boys’ Association (KCOBA). Government insists that this is not a sale or privatisation and that legal ownership remains with the Federal Government. Under the arrangement, KCOBA is expected to finance, rehabilitate, modernise, operate and maintain the school, while government retains regulatory and monitoring powers.

KCOBA, on its part, has presented the arrangement as a rescue and renaissance project. It announced a proposed N100 billion fund and substantial initial financial commitments to transform the institution.

On paper, rehabilitation of a historic school is difficult to oppose.
But the problem is not necessarily the desire to improve King’s College. The problem is the process, the unanswered questions and the damage the dispute has already caused.

Sometimes, a good idea can be badly communicated. This is an important distinction that government must confront. A concession may be legally different from a sale. A public-private partnership may preserve government ownership. But to parents, teachers and workers, management rights over a public institution for decades can still represent a fundamental change in the character of that institution.

That distinction cannot be settled merely by repeating that “the school has not been sold.”

The real questions are: What exactly has been granted? For how long? Under what conditions? Who controls the school? Who appoints the managers? Who determines fees? Who protects the interests of existing students? What happens when the private or alumni partner fails to meet its obligations?
These are legitimate public questions.

Reports indicate that the proposed arrangement is for 35 years. The Federal Government has now suspended implementation for two weeks and established a seven-member committee to review and negotiate aspects of the agreement with labour. Police were also ordered withdrawn from the school premises, while unions suspended their industrial action. This pause is welcome.

But it must not become another temporary settlement designed merely to restore calm. It should be used to reopen the entire process.

The most troubling dimension of the crisis is that children have become collateral damage in a dispute between adults. At the height of the controversy, workers’ unions directed staff across Federal Unity Colleges not to resume, disrupting the 2026/2027 academic session. Reports indicated that 112 of the country’s 115 Federal Unity Colleges were affected at one point.

But the Federal Government must answer the transparency questions.
It cannot escape responsibility by saying that the concession was properly approved. Approval is not the same thing as transparency. A major public asset being handed over for long-term management should withstand public scrutiny. Nigerians deserve to know the material provisions of the agreement hence, the ‘If’ Scrutiny:

*If the agreement protects students, workers, parents and the public interest, publishing it should strengthen confidence rather than weaken it.

*If government retains ownership, Nigerians should be able to see precisely how that ownership is protected.

*If government retains regulatory powers, Nigerians should know what those powers are.

*If KCOBA is investing billions of naira, Nigerians should know what it is expected to provide, by when and against what measurable standards.

*If funding from the Federation Account is to cease after a defined period, Nigerians should know what replaces it.

*And if the concession lasts 35 years, there must be clear provisions for periodic review, performance assessment and termination in the event of non-performance.

These are not unreasonable demands, but the minimum requirements of public accountability.

There is also a legal and moral dimension that government should not overlook.

Section 1 of the Child Rights Act provides that in every action concerning a child by an individual, public or private body, institution or administrative authority, the best interest of the child shall be the primary consideration.

That principle should guide this entire dispute. Not the convenience of government, nor the pride of alumni, the demands of unions, the fears of parents, and not even the financial attractiveness of a concession.

The child comes first hence, the present and indeed, any future concession of a Federal Unity College should require a formal child-impact assessment.

The desire of King’s College old boys to mobilise resources for their alma mater is therefore commendable.They deserve credit, but not a blank cheque.
The reported N100 billion transformation fund demonstrates ambition, but goodwill cannot substitute for governance.

But what happens to the Unity College idea?

This is where the King’s College controversy becomes much bigger than King’s College.
Nigeria’s Federal Unity Colleges were never conceived simply as buildings where children attend classes.
They were part of a national integration project.

A child from Kano could sit beside a child from Enugu. A child from Rivers could share a dormitory with a child from Kaduna. Friendships formed across ethnic and regional boundaries. Nigeria was taught not only in classrooms but also in dining halls, laboratories, sports fields and dormitories.

That mission is becoming increasingly important in a country facing serious social fragmentation.
If government gradually moves towards concession, partnership or alternative management arrangements for its colleges, it must first define what cannot be surrendered.

The physical infrastructure can be renovated, laboratories can be modernised, the hostels can be rebuilt, Information technology can be upgraded,
but the national character of the schools must remain protected.
A Federal Unity College must not gradually become an elite private school carrying a federal government name.

Now that the Federal Government has bought itself two weeks to look at the King’s College concession policy once again, it should not waste the opportunity.

The current two-week suspension should therefore be used to develop a national framework for not only all future Federal Unity College partnerships, but indeed, public schools at all levels.

We, at Disclosure News, advise that, it should rather mark the beginning of a broader conversation about public education in Nigeria, towards charting a solid, sustainable, and globally competitive education ecosystem.

Editorial

EDITORIAL: COP31: Nigeria must move beyond climate promises to concrete action

Published

on

As world leaders, climate experts, environmental activists and policymakers gather in Antalya, Türkiye, for the 31st Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP31), the attention of the international community is once again focused on the urgent need to confront the growing threat of climate change. Holding from November 9 to 20, 2026, the conference provides another opportunity for countries to review their climate commitments, negotiate practical solutions and strengthen international cooperation against environmental degradation. For Nigeria, however, COP31 should represent more than another international gathering. It should be an opportunity to confront the country’s worsening environmental challenges and demonstrate a genuine commitment to climate action.

The reality is that Nigeria is increasingly exposed to the devastating consequences of climate change. From recurring floods that displace communities and destroy homes to prolonged droughts, desertification, rising temperatures and coastal erosion, the country’s environmental challenges have become more complicated. These developments threaten food security, public health, economic stability and the livelihoods of millions of Nigerians.
The devastating floods experienced in different parts of the country in recent years have demonstrated the extent of Nigeria’s vulnerability. Communities have lost homes, farmlands, businesses and critical infrastructure. In the northern region, desertification and declining rainfall continue to threaten agricultural activities and livelihoods, while coastal communities in the South face rising sea levels, erosion and the consequences of environmental degradation.

The Niger Delta presents another disturbing dimension of Nigeria’s climate challenges. Years of oil exploration, gas flaring, oil spills and environmental pollution have left many communities struggling with damaged ecosystems and declining agricultural and fishing activities. The environmental consequences of these activities have compounded the difficulties associated with climate change, making the region particularly vulnerable.

Unfortunately, Nigeria’s response to these challenges has not matched the urgency of the situation. Although the country has established climate policies and institutions, including the National Council on Climate Change, the major challenge remains translating policy commitments into measurable results.
Nigeria’s Climate Change Act of 2021 provided an important legal framework for addressing climate issues. Similarly, the country’s commitments under the Paris Agreement demonstrate its recognition of the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and pursue a sustainable development pathway. However, the existence of policies and legislation is not enough. Their implementation, monitoring and enforcement must become government priorities.

One major challenge confronting Nigeria is inadequate climate financing. Addressing climate change requires substantial investment in renewable energy, flood-control infrastructure, climate-smart agriculture, environmental restoration and disaster management.
Nigeria is reportedly seeking about $336.5 billion to finance climate mitigation and adaptation programmes between 2026 and 2035. This enormous financial requirement underscores the magnitude of the challenge before the country. It also reinforces the need for Nigeria to use COP31 to attract international support, private-sector investment and technology partnerships.

While international climate financing remains important, Nigeria must equally demonstrate accountability and transparency in the utilisation of available resources. Climate funds should not become another avenue for corruption, mismanagement and abandoned projects. Every investment must produce tangible benefits for vulnerable communities.

Another critical issue Nigeria must address is its continued dependence on fossil fuels. Although oil and gas remain important contributors to the country’s revenue and foreign exchange earnings, the country cannot afford to ignore the global transition towards cleaner energy.
Gas flaring, particularly in the Niger Delta, remains a major environmental concern. Government must strengthen regulations against illegal gas flaring, enforce environmental standards and accelerate investments in renewable energy sources such as solar, wind and hydropower.

Nigeria possesses enormous renewable energy potential. Harnessing these resources would not only help reduce emissions but also address the country’s persistent electricity challenges. Expanding access to affordable solar energy, particularly in rural communities, would support small businesses, improve healthcare delivery and strengthen educational institutions.
Agriculture is another sector requiring urgent attention. Millions of Nigerians depend on farming for their livelihoods, yet changing rainfall patterns, flooding, drought and soil degradation continue to undermine agricultural productivity. Government must therefore invest in climate-resilient seeds, irrigation systems, modern agricultural technology, weather forecasting and extension services.

Equally important is the need to strengthen Nigeria’s disaster preparedness. The recurring experience of flooding in several states exposes the weaknesses in urban planning, drainage infrastructure and early-warning systems. Federal, state and local governments must work together to enforce building regulations, protect waterways, improve drainage systems and discourage indiscriminate construction on floodplains.

Furthermore, the destruction of forests and indiscriminate tree felling must be addressed through sustained afforestation programmes and stronger environmental protection measures.
COP31 must also provide Nigeria with an opportunity to strengthen its international climate diplomacy. As one of Africa’s largest economies and most populous countries, Nigeria has an important responsibility to champion the continent’s demand for climate justice.
Africa contributes relatively little to global greenhouse gas emissions compared with major industrialised economies, yet it suffers disproportionately from the consequences of climate change. It is therefore imperative that developed countries honour their climate-financing commitments and provide accessible funding, technology transfer and capacity-building support to vulnerable developing nations.

Nigeria must work closely with other African countries to demand fair and predictable climate financing, particularly for adaptation and loss-and-damage programmes. However, such demands must be accompanied by credible domestic climate policies and transparent implementation frameworks.

The human dimension of climate change must equally receive greater attention. Poor households, rural farmers, fishing communities, women and children are often the worst affected by environmental disasters, despite contributing least to the problem. Government’s climate policies must therefore prioritise vulnerable populations and ensure that the transition towards a green economy does not create additional economic hardship.

There is also an urgent need to involve young Nigerians in climate action. Through environmental education, research, innovation and green entrepreneurship, young people can become important contributors to the country’s sustainable development ambitions.

Ultimately, Nigeria must recognise that climate change is not merely an environmental issue. It is an economic, social, developmental and national security challenge. The destruction of agricultural livelihoods, displacement of communities and competition over increasingly scarce natural resources can deepen poverty and social instability.

As COP31 progresses in Antalya, the Federal Government must ensure that Nigeria’s participation goes beyond diplomatic speeches and the presentation of ambitious proposals. The country must return with concrete agreements, investment opportunities and practical strategies that can be implemented at home.

The Federal Government should establish clear implementation targets, strengthen environmental regulatory institutions, improve coordination among the three tiers of government and ensure that climate policies are backed by adequate funding. The National Council on Climate Change must also be empowered to monitor progress and hold relevant institutions accountable.

Nigeria cannot afford to treat climate change as a distant threat or an issue to be discussed only during international conferences. Its consequences are already visible in the country’s farms, rivers, forests, cities and coastal communities.

COP31 must therefore serve as a turning point in Nigeria’s environmental governance. The country must move from promises to performance, from policy declarations to practical implementation and from dependence on fossil fuels towards a more diversified and sustainable energy future.

The time for climate rhetoric is over. What Nigeria needs now is determined leadership, responsible environmental management, international cooperation and sustained investment in a climate-resilient economy. The future of millions of Nigerians, particularly generations yet unborn, depends on the decisions and actions taken today.

Continue Reading

Editorial

EDITORIAL: Harnessing Nigeria’s IT strength in building a formidable economy

Published

on

Nigeria must move beyond celebrating its growing technological potential to strategically deploying information technology as a major driver of economic transformation, industrial
growth and national prosperity.
Nigeria stands at a critical point in its economic development, where the effective deployment of Information Technology (IT) could determine its capacity to compete favourably in the global economy. With a large youthful population, a growing pool of technology talents, an expanding telecommunications industry and an increasingly vibrant digital entrepreneurship ecosystem, the country possesses considerable advantages that could be harnessed to build a formidable economy.
Unfortunately, these advantages remain largely underexploited. While several countries are using technological innovation to accelerate industrialisation, improve productivity, create employment and strengthen their economic competitiveness, Nigeria is yet to fully translate its IT potential into sustainable economic prosperity.
The country’s technology ecosystem has recorded remarkable growth in recent years. The emergence of indigenous fintech companies, digital payment platforms, software development enterprises, e-commerce businesses and technology-driven startups demonstrates that Nigerians possess the creativity and technical capacity to compete on the international stage.
The success of companies such as Flutterwave, Paystack and Interswitch illustrates how innovation can transform financial transactions, facilitate commerce and expand economic opportunities. These developments have also demonstrated that technology is no longer merely a supporting instrument of economic activities but a critical component of modern economic growth.
However, the challenge before Nigeria is how to move beyond isolated technological successes and build a comprehensive digital economy capable of transforming agriculture, manufacturing, education, healthcare, transportation, security and public administration.

For a country aspiring to become a major African economic powerhouse, this transformation cannot be postponed.

One of the most important areas requiring government attention is digital infrastructure. Reliable electricity, affordable broadband internet, extensive fibre-optic networks and efficient telecommunications services are fundamental to technological development. It is difficult to build a competitive digital economy in an environment where businesses struggle with unstable electricity, expensive internet services and inadequate connectivity.

The Federal Government must therefore prioritise investments in digital infrastructure, particularly in rural communities and underserved areas. Expanding broadband penetration will not only improve communication but also create opportunities for remote employment, online education, digital commerce and technology-driven businesses.

Equally important is the development of human capital. Nigeria’s youthful population represents an enormous economic asset, but this advantage could become a liability if millions of young people remain inadequately equipped with the skills required by the modern economy.

Government, educational institutions and the private sector must collaborate to make digital literacy, coding, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, robotics, data analytics and software development integral components of the country’s educational and vocational training systems.

There is also an urgent need to reform the educational curriculum to reflect the realities of a technology-driven global economy. Producing graduates whose qualifications are disconnected from the demands of the labour market will only deepen unemployment and underemployment.

Furthermore, Nigeria must create an enabling environment for technology entrepreneurs and startups. Access to affordable financing, favourable taxation, regulatory stability and adequate protection of intellectual property rights are essential to encouraging innovation.

Many promising Nigerian technology entrepreneurs struggle to expand their businesses because of limited access to capital, inconsistent government policies and the high cost of doing business. The government must address these obstacles through deliberate policies that encourage indigenous innovation and attract both local and foreign investments.

The Nigerian financial technology sector has already demonstrated the transformative capacity of digital innovation. However, similar achievements must be replicated in agriculture, manufacturing and other productive sectors.

For instance, technology can help farmers access weather information, improve agricultural productivity, identify markets and obtain financial services. In manufacturing, automation and digital production systems can reduce operational costs, improve product quality and enhance competitiveness. In healthcare, telemedicine and digital health records can improve access to medical services, particularly in underserved communities.

Nigeria must also recognise the enormous economic opportunities presented by artificial intelligence. Although the technology is still evolving, its applications in business administration, education, agriculture, financial services, healthcare and industrial production are increasingly significant.

The country should develop a national artificial intelligence framework that encourages responsible innovation, protects citizens’ data and prepares Nigerian businesses and workers for the changing demands of the global economy.

Another critical consideration is the need to strengthen cybersecurity and data protection. As more economic activities migrate to digital platforms, the risks associated with cybercrime, financial fraud, identity theft and data breaches will increase. Without adequate safeguards, public confidence in the digital economy could be undermined.

The government must strengthen regulatory institutions, improve cybersecurity infrastructure and promote public awareness of digital safety.
Beyond these measures, Nigeria must deliberately position itself as a destination for global technology investments. The country’s large consumer market, entrepreneurial population and strategic location within Africa provide opportunities to attract technology companies seeking to expand their operations across the continent.

However, attracting these investments requires policy consistency, institutional transparency, economic stability and an efficient business environment.
The government must equally address the persistent problem of brain drain in the technology sector. It is regrettable that many highly skilled Nigerian technology professionals seek opportunities abroad because of better remuneration, infrastructure and working conditions.

While Nigerians should be free to pursue opportunities anywhere in the world, government must create conditions that make the country attractive for technology professionals to establish businesses, develop innovations and transfer knowledge.

There is also a compelling need to deploy IT in improving governance. Digitalisation of public services can reduce bureaucratic bottlenecks, improve revenue collection, promote transparency and minimise opportunities for corruption.

Government institutions should embrace technology in procurement, tax administration, public records management and service delivery.
Nevertheless, the development of Nigeria’s digital economy must not be concentrated in major cities alone. Rural communities, small businesses, women and economically disadvantaged groups must be included in the country’s digital transformation agenda. Otherwise, the technology revolution could widen existing economic inequalities.

Ultimately, Nigeria’s ambition to build a formidable economy cannot be realised through dependence on crude oil and other traditional sources of revenue alone. The future belongs increasingly to economies that invest in knowledge, innovation, technology and human capital.

The Federal Government must therefore move beyond policy pronouncements and translate its digital economy ambitions into measurable programmes with clear implementation timelines. State governments, the private sector, universities and technology entrepreneurs must also become active partners in this national project.
Nigeria has the talent, population, entrepreneurial spirit and market potential to become one of Africa’s leading technology-driven economies. What is required is visionary leadership, strategic investment, policy consistency and the political will to turn these advantages into tangible economic benefits.

The time has come for Nigeria to stop treating Information Technology as a peripheral sector and begin recognising it as a central pillar of national economic development. Harnessing the country’s IT strength is not merely about embracing modern technology; it is about creating jobs, stimulating industrial growth, diversifying the economy, improving productivity and securing prosperity for future generations.

A Nigeria that successfully harnesses its technological potential will be better positioned to compete globally, create wealth domestically and build the formidable economy its citizens deserve.

Continue Reading

Editorial

EDITORIAL: Sanitising Nigeria’s Power Sector: The urgent need to end corruption, inefficiency and exploitation

Published

on

Nigeria’s electricity sector has remained one of the most troubling examples of institutional failure, corruption and policy inconsistency in the country. Despite successive governments spending enormous sums of public money on power sector reforms, the country continues to grapple with epileptic electricity supply, frequent grid collapses, inflated electricity bills, poor service delivery and the persistent exploitation of consumers. This unfortunate situation raises fundamental questions about the management, accountability and integrity of the sector.

For a country with a population exceeding 200 million people and enormous economic potential, Nigeria’s inability to provide stable and affordable electricity is not only embarrassing but also economically damaging. Industries are shutting down or relocating, small businesses are struggling to survive, hospitals are forced to depend on alternative power sources, and households are spending an increasing proportion of their incomes on petrol and diesel to generate electricity. The power sector, which should be a catalyst for economic development, has instead become a major obstacle to national productivity.

There is, therefore, an urgent need to sanitise the sector and address the deep-rooted problems undermining its performance.

One of the greatest challenges confronting Nigeria’s electricity industry is the apparent lack of transparency and accountability among some of its operators. Since the privatisation of the power sector in 2013, expectations were high that private-sector participation would improve efficiency, attract investment and guarantee reliable electricity supply. Unfortunately, more than a decade after the exercise, the expected transformation remains largely elusive.

The privatisation process itself has continued to attract criticism over the capacity, competence and financial preparedness of some investors who acquired electricity distribution and generation companies. While it would be unfair to blame every failure in the sector on the private operators, the government must critically examine whether the objectives of privatisation have been achieved.

It is unacceptable that electricity distribution companies (DisCos) continue to demand higher tariffs from consumers while failing to provide electricity commensurate with the payments demanded. Consumers are regularly confronted with estimated billing, arbitrary charges, poor metering arrangements and inadequate responses to complaints. This practice must not be allowed to continue.
The Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) must demonstrate greater determination in enforcing regulations and protecting consumers. Regulatory institutions should not exist merely to issue licences, announce tariff adjustments and make policy statements. Their primary responsibility must include ensuring that electricity operators deliver quality services, maintain transparency and account for their operations.

Furthermore, the activities of electricity generation companies (GenCos), transmission operators and distribution companies must be subjected to regular independent performance assessments. Operators that consistently fail to meet their contractual obligations should face appropriate sanctions, while those demonstrating efficiency and improved service delivery should receive the necessary incentives.

Another critical issue requiring urgent attention is the persistent collapse of the national electricity grid. Repeated grid disturbances expose the weaknesses of Nigeria’s transmission infrastructure and the failure to make adequate investments in modern equipment. Government must prioritise the rehabilitation and expansion of transmission facilities, strengthen the national grid and accelerate the development of alternative electricity distribution arrangements.

The problem of corruption and financial mismanagement must also be confronted. The power sector has consumed enormous public resources through interventions, bailouts, subsidies and other financial commitments. Yet, Nigerians continue to experience inadequate electricity supply. Government must commission comprehensive independent audits of public funds allocated to the sector and ensure that every naira spent produces measurable results.

Equally disturbing is the problem of electricity theft, illegal connections and vandalism of power infrastructure. These activities contribute to revenue losses and undermine the financial sustainability of the industry. However, enforcement must be balanced with public education, affordable access and improved customer service. Consumers cannot reasonably be expected to fulfil their financial obligations when operators fail to provide reliable services.

The ongoing electricity reforms under the Electricity Act 2023 also present an opportunity to address some of these challenges. The law provides a framework for greater participation by state governments in electricity generation, transmission and distribution within their jurisdictions. This decentralisation should be properly implemented to encourage investment, competition and innovative solutions to Nigeria’s electricity crisis.

Nevertheless, decentralisation must not become another avenue for political patronage, regulatory confusion and financial exploitation. State governments seeking to participate in the electricity market must demonstrate the technical and financial capacity to manage their responsibilities effectively.
There is also an urgent need to encourage renewable energy investment, particularly solar power, mini-grids and other alternative sources. Nigeria cannot continue to depend excessively on an unreliable national grid when millions of citizens remain without access to dependable electricity. A diversified energy mix would help improve electricity access, particularly in rural communities and underserved areas.
However, the most important requirement for sanitising the sector is political will. Successive administrations have announced ambitious electricity reforms without demonstrating sufficient commitment to addressing the fundamental problems. Government must be prepared to confront powerful interests, expose financial irregularities and hold influential individuals and institutions accountable, irrespective of their political connections.

The National Assembly also has an important responsibility to strengthen legislative oversight of the sector. Public hearings, independent investigations and regular reviews of the activities of electricity operators should become meaningful instruments for ensuring accountability rather than political exercises.

Above all, consumers must be treated as important stakeholders rather than helpless sources of revenue. There should be transparent billing systems, adequate metering, effective complaint-resolution mechanisms and compensation for consumers who suffer prolonged service failures in accordance with applicable regulations.
Nigeria’s power sector cannot be sanitised through cosmetic reforms, tariff increases or political declarations. It requires a fundamental restructuring of the industry’s governance, financial management and operational standards.
The Federal Government must therefore rise to the challenge by initiating a comprehensive review of the sector, strengthening regulatory institutions, investigating allegations of corruption, enforcing contractual obligations and ensuring that electricity operators are held accountable for their performance.
Nigerians have endured years of darkness, economic hardship and unfulfilled promises. They deserve an electricity system that works, not one that continuously demands more money while delivering less service.
The time has come to end the culture of impunity, inefficiency and exploitation in the power sector. Until transparency, accountability and competence become the guiding principles of the industry, Nigeria’s quest for stable electricity will remain an elusive dream.

A functional power sector is not a luxury; it is the foundation of industrial growth, economic prosperity and national development. Government must act decisively before the crisis inflicts even greater damage on the nation’s economy.

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration must demonstrate the political courage to confront the powerful interests that have held Nigeria’s electricity sector hostage for decades. The Federal Government cannot continue to spend public funds on interventions, announce new reforms and increase electricity tariffs without demanding corresponding improvements in service delivery.

Nigerians deserve to know how much public money has been committed to the sector, what results have been achieved and who should be held accountable for persistent failures.

NERC must also rise above regulatory complacency and demonstrate that it has the authority, independence and determination to discipline erring operators. Electricity distribution companies that consistently fail to meet their obligations should not be allowed to hide behind excuses while imposing questionable bills and demanding higher payments from frustrated consumers. Where necessary, government must review the ownership, management and operational arrangements of companies that have demonstrated persistent incapacity.

The National Assembly, on its part, must intensify its oversight responsibilities and ensure that investigations into the sector’s financial and operational failures produce concrete consequences. Those found culpable of corruption, financial recklessness or abuse of public resources must be made to face the law, regardless of their political or economic influence.

More importantly, government must stop treating electricity as a privilege that Nigerians should struggle to purchase at exorbitant costs. Reliable electricity is fundamental to economic development and the welfare of citizens. A country that cannot guarantee stable power cannot realistically aspire to industrialisation, job creation and sustainable economic growth.

The Tinubu administration must therefore make the sanitisation of the power sector a national priority. It must move beyond rhetoric and embark on a transparent, measurable and uncompromising reform programme that restores public confidence in the industry.

Nigeria cannot continue to operate in darkness while those entrusted with managing its electricity sector enjoy the benefits of a system that has failed millions of citizens. The time for excuses is over. The time for accountability, genuine reforms and reliable electricity is now.

Continue Reading

Trending