Editorial
Fuel Subsidy Politics: Nigerians must not be deceived again

As the 2027 elections approach,
politicians must stop treating fuel subsidy as an electoral bargaining chip. Nigerians deserve affordable energy, transparent governance and credible economic policies, not promises designed merely to capture power.
Few economic policies have generated as much controversy, hardship and political argument in Nigeria as the removal of the petrol subsidy. Since President Bola Ahmed Tinubu announced the policy on May 29, 2023, Nigerians have grappled with rising transportation costs, expensive food, higher production expenses and a persistent decline in their purchasing power.
Now, as the country prepares for the 2027 general elections, fuel subsidy has returned to the centre of political debate. Politicians are presenting competing proposals, with some promising to restore government support for petrol /prices and others defending the decision to allow market forces to determine prices.
This renewed controversy raises a fundamental question: Is the fuel subsidy debate genuinely about the welfare of Nigerians, or has it become another instrument for winning political power?
The answer demands a sober examination of the facts, the consequences of existing policies and the credibility of the alternatives being proposed.
What is beyond dispute is that millions of Nigerians are struggling with the cost of living. Any government or political party that ignores this reality does so at its own peril. Equally, those who exploit the suffering of citizens to make financially unsustainable promises must be challenged to explain how their proposals would work.
THE HIGH PRICE OF SUBSIDY REMOVAL
The Tinubu administration justified the removal of petrol subsidy on the grounds that the arrangement placed an unsustainable burden on public finances, encouraged abuses and diverted resources from essential public services.
The argument was that Nigeria could no longer afford to spend enormous sums maintaining artificially low petrol prices when the country faced serious deficits in infrastructure, healthcare, education and security.
There was merit in demanding a more transparent and sustainable system of managing public resources. However, the manner in which the policy affected ordinary Nigerians has raised legitimate questions about the adequacy of the government’s preparations and social protection measures.
The immediate consequences were severe. Transportation became more expensive, businesses faced higher operating costs, and the prices of many goods and services came under additional pressure.
Workers found that their incomes could purchase less than before, while small-business owners struggled to absorb the rising costs of transportation, electricity generation and distribution.
The burden has been particularly difficult for low-income households, which spend a large proportion of their earnings on food, transportation and other necessities.
Three years into the reform period, the central issue is not simply whether subsidy removal was economically defensible. It is whether the government has done enough to protect vulnerable citizens and ensure that the expected benefits of the policy reach them.
Economic reforms must be judged not only by government revenue or investor confidence but also by their consequences for employment, household welfare, business survival and the standard of living.
A policy that promises long-term gains cannot be sustained indefinitely on the basis of explanations while citizens continue to demand tangible improvements.
THE RETURN OF SUBSIDY PROMISES
The approach of the 2027 elections has brought the subsidy debate back into the political arena with renewed intensity.
Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar has pledged to restore a form of petrol subsidy if elected president, arguing that government has a responsibility to protect citizens from unbearable living costs. Other political figures have proposed different ways of reducing petrol prices, including support for domestic refining.
These proposals deserve serious examination rather than automatic acceptance or outright dismissal.
The public has every right to question whether the existing system is delivering sufficient benefits and whether alternative policies could offer more effective relief.
However, promises of cheaper petrol must be accompanied by credible explanations of their financial implications. Any candidate advocating subsidy restoration should disclose the estimated annual cost, the proposed funding source, the intended beneficiaries and the safeguards against corruption and waste.
If support is directed towards domestic refiners rather than imported petrol, candidates must explain how the arrangement would translate into lower pump prices, how its costs would be monitored and how consumers would be protected against exploitation.
The same standard must apply to politicians promising substantial reductions in petrol prices without restoring subsidy. They must explain the economic assumptions behind their promises and identify the practical measures that would make such reductions possible.
Nigerians have heard enough political assurances. What they need now are workable proposals supported by transparent calculations.
GOVERNMENT MUST ACCOUNT FOR THE SACRIFICES OF NIGERIANS
The Federal Government cannot reasonably expect citizens to accept the burden of subsidy removal indefinitely without demanding a clear account of its benefits.
If the reform has freed substantial resources for public investment, Nigerians deserve to know how much has been saved, how those resources have been distributed among the different tiers of government and what measurable improvements have resulted.
How much has gone into public transportation, healthcare, education, road construction, agricultural development and social welfare?
What proportion has reached the poorest households? How many jobs have been created through programmes funded by the additional resources? What concrete measures have been introduced to reduce the cost of doing business?
These are legitimate questions that should not be dismissed as political opposition.
In August 2026, the Federal Government organised a briefing on the savings associated with subsidy removal, reflecting the importance of public accountability in the reform process. Such disclosures should become a regular practice, with clear records that allow citizens to assess how the resources are being used.
Government should publish periodic, independently verifiable reports detailing the revenue implications of the policy, the allocation of the proceeds and the outcomes of funded projects.
State governments and local government authorities must also demonstrate how the additional resources available to them have improved public services and living conditions.
Without this transparency, the public will continue to question whether the sacrifices demanded of citizens are producing benefits commensurate with the hardship endured.
THE DANGER OF ELECTION-TIME POPULISM
Fuel subsidy is particularly attractive to politicians because its effects are immediately visible in the daily lives of voters.
A promise to reduce petrol prices appeals directly to commuters, transport operators, traders, farmers and manufacturers. It is therefore understandable that candidates would seek to make the issue a major part of their campaigns.
But the danger arises when political parties focus on the immediate popularity of their promises without explaining the financial obligations those promises would create.
Universal fuel subsidies can be expensive, and poorly designed arrangements can encourage smuggling, diversion of petroleum products, fraudulent claims and benefits that are not fairly distributed.
If subsidy is restored without adequate safeguards, the government could find itself committing public resources to a programme that is difficult to sustain. The resulting fiscal pressure could undermine investment in essential services and create further economic problems.
Yet the opposite extreme is equally troubling. Government cannot simply invoke fiscal discipline while overlooking the suffering of citizens who can no longer comfortably afford transportation and basic necessities.
The real challenge is to reconcile responsible public spending with the obligation to protect the population.
This requires more than a choice between restoring the old subsidy system and leaving consumers entirely exposed to price fluctuations.
Government can consider targeted transport assistance, support for vulnerable households, affordable mass transit, reliable public infrastructure and carefully monitored interventions that provide relief without creating an uncontrolled financial burden.
Such measures must be transparent, properly funded and evaluated according to their actual impact.
The 2027 election campaign should not become a contest in which candidates compete to make the most attractive promises while leaving the public to discover their costs later.
DOMESTIC REFINING IS NOT AN AUTOMATIC GUARANTEE OF CHEAP PETROL
Nigeria’s expanding domestic refining capacity offers an important opportunity to reduce dependence on imported petroleum products and strengthen the country’s energy security.
However, the existence of domestic refineries does not automatically guarantee cheap petrol.
Prices remain influenced by crude oil costs, exchange rates, refining expenses, distribution charges and other market conditions. Domestic production may reduce certain costs and supply risks, but the extent of the benefits depends on the economics of production and the structure of the market.
Consequently, politicians promising dramatic reductions in petrol prices must explain how those reductions would be achieved.
If government intends to support local refiners through preferential crude-oil arrangements or other incentives, it must demonstrate how consumers will benefit and how the cost of such support will be accounted for.
Similarly, the government should promote fair competition, transparent pricing practices, reliable petroleum supply and investments that improve the efficiency of the energy sector.
Over the longer term, greater investment in public transportation, compressed natural gas, renewable energy and more efficient transport systems could reduce the country’s vulnerability to petrol-price shocks.
The objective should be to build an energy system that supports economic development while reducing the pressure that fuel costs place on households and businesses.
THE PEOPLE MUST COME BEFORE POLITICAL CALCULATIONS
The most troubling aspect of the subsidy debate is the risk that the welfare of Nigerians will become secondary to the political ambitions of those seeking office.
Citizens should not have to endure years of economic hardship only to become the subjects of competing promises whenever elections approach.
The responsibility of government is continuous. It does not begin when campaigns commence, and it does not end when election results are announced.
The Federal Government must show that its economic reforms are improving the lives of citizens. Opposition parties must demonstrate that their alternatives are practical, affordable and sustainable. Neither side should be allowed to escape scrutiny.
The media, labour unions, civil society organisations, professional bodies and other stakeholders should intensify efforts to ensure that the subsidy debate is informed by evidence rather than political emotion.
Candidates should be asked to publish their energy policies, identify their funding sources, explain the likely effects on public finances and specify the measures they would introduce to protect vulnerable Nigerians.
They should also provide clear timelines and measurable targets against which their promises can be assessed.
Voters, for their part, must look beyond campaign slogans and demand explanations that address both immediate relief and long-term economic stability.
CONCLUSION: THE TIME FOR EXCUSES AND EMPTY PROMISES IS OVER
As Nigeria approaches the 2027 general elections, the politics of fuel subsidy presents an important test of political responsibility and economic leadership.
The removal of subsidy has imposed considerable hardship on many Nigerians, while the argument for fiscal sustainability remains an important consideration in managing public resources. Neither reality should be ignored.
What the country needs is a transparent and practical policy that addresses the cost of energy, protects vulnerable households, supports productive businesses and prevents public resources from being wasted.
The government must account for the benefits of its reforms and demonstrate how the savings are improving public welfare. Politicians proposing a return to subsidy must explain how they will fund it without creating another unsustainable burden. Those promising cheaper petrol through alternative arrangements must show how their plans will work in practice.
The Independent National Electoral Commission, media organisations and civil society groups should ensure that fuel pricing receives serious attention during public debates and candidate interviews. Nigerians must be given the opportunity to scrutinise the policies of those seeking their mandate.
The 2027 elections must not become another occasion for politicians to purchase public sympathy with promises they cannot fulfil. The welfare of Nigerians is too important to be reduced to an election slogan.
Ultimately, the success of any administration should be measured by whether citizens can afford to travel to work, transport their goods to market, feed their families and operate their businesses without being overwhelmed by the cost of energy.
Nigeria needs leaders who can combine economic discipline with compassion, public accountability with practical action, and political ambition with a genuine commitment to the common good.
Fuel subsidy must cease to be a weapon in the struggle for political power and become part of an honest national conversation about affordability, economic justice and responsible governance. Nigerians have made sacrifices. They now deserve answers, measurable results and policies that improve their lives.
Editorial
EDITORIAL: COP31: Nigeria must move beyond climate promises to concrete action

As world leaders, climate experts, environmental activists and policymakers gather in Antalya, Türkiye, for the 31st Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP31), the attention of the international community is once again focused on the urgent need to confront the growing threat of climate change. Holding from November 9 to 20, 2026, the conference provides another opportunity for countries to review their climate commitments, negotiate practical solutions and strengthen international cooperation against environmental degradation. For Nigeria, however, COP31 should represent more than another international gathering. It should be an opportunity to confront the country’s worsening environmental challenges and demonstrate a genuine commitment to climate action.
The reality is that Nigeria is increasingly exposed to the devastating consequences of climate change. From recurring floods that displace communities and destroy homes to prolonged droughts, desertification, rising temperatures and coastal erosion, the country’s environmental challenges have become more complicated. These developments threaten food security, public health, economic stability and the livelihoods of millions of Nigerians.
The devastating floods experienced in different parts of the country in recent years have demonstrated the extent of Nigeria’s vulnerability. Communities have lost homes, farmlands, businesses and critical infrastructure. In the northern region, desertification and declining rainfall continue to threaten agricultural activities and livelihoods, while coastal communities in the South face rising sea levels, erosion and the consequences of environmental degradation.
The Niger Delta presents another disturbing dimension of Nigeria’s climate challenges. Years of oil exploration, gas flaring, oil spills and environmental pollution have left many communities struggling with damaged ecosystems and declining agricultural and fishing activities. The environmental consequences of these activities have compounded the difficulties associated with climate change, making the region particularly vulnerable.
Unfortunately, Nigeria’s response to these challenges has not matched the urgency of the situation. Although the country has established climate policies and institutions, including the National Council on Climate Change, the major challenge remains translating policy commitments into measurable results.
Nigeria’s Climate Change Act of 2021 provided an important legal framework for addressing climate issues. Similarly, the country’s commitments under the Paris Agreement demonstrate its recognition of the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and pursue a sustainable development pathway. However, the existence of policies and legislation is not enough. Their implementation, monitoring and enforcement must become government priorities.
One major challenge confronting Nigeria is inadequate climate financing. Addressing climate change requires substantial investment in renewable energy, flood-control infrastructure, climate-smart agriculture, environmental restoration and disaster management.
Nigeria is reportedly seeking about $336.5 billion to finance climate mitigation and adaptation programmes between 2026 and 2035. This enormous financial requirement underscores the magnitude of the challenge before the country. It also reinforces the need for Nigeria to use COP31 to attract international support, private-sector investment and technology partnerships.
While international climate financing remains important, Nigeria must equally demonstrate accountability and transparency in the utilisation of available resources. Climate funds should not become another avenue for corruption, mismanagement and abandoned projects. Every investment must produce tangible benefits for vulnerable communities.
Another critical issue Nigeria must address is its continued dependence on fossil fuels. Although oil and gas remain important contributors to the country’s revenue and foreign exchange earnings, the country cannot afford to ignore the global transition towards cleaner energy.
Gas flaring, particularly in the Niger Delta, remains a major environmental concern. Government must strengthen regulations against illegal gas flaring, enforce environmental standards and accelerate investments in renewable energy sources such as solar, wind and hydropower.
Nigeria possesses enormous renewable energy potential. Harnessing these resources would not only help reduce emissions but also address the country’s persistent electricity challenges. Expanding access to affordable solar energy, particularly in rural communities, would support small businesses, improve healthcare delivery and strengthen educational institutions.
Agriculture is another sector requiring urgent attention. Millions of Nigerians depend on farming for their livelihoods, yet changing rainfall patterns, flooding, drought and soil degradation continue to undermine agricultural productivity. Government must therefore invest in climate-resilient seeds, irrigation systems, modern agricultural technology, weather forecasting and extension services.
Equally important is the need to strengthen Nigeria’s disaster preparedness. The recurring experience of flooding in several states exposes the weaknesses in urban planning, drainage infrastructure and early-warning systems. Federal, state and local governments must work together to enforce building regulations, protect waterways, improve drainage systems and discourage indiscriminate construction on floodplains.
Furthermore, the destruction of forests and indiscriminate tree felling must be addressed through sustained afforestation programmes and stronger environmental protection measures.
COP31 must also provide Nigeria with an opportunity to strengthen its international climate diplomacy. As one of Africa’s largest economies and most populous countries, Nigeria has an important responsibility to champion the continent’s demand for climate justice.
Africa contributes relatively little to global greenhouse gas emissions compared with major industrialised economies, yet it suffers disproportionately from the consequences of climate change. It is therefore imperative that developed countries honour their climate-financing commitments and provide accessible funding, technology transfer and capacity-building support to vulnerable developing nations.
Nigeria must work closely with other African countries to demand fair and predictable climate financing, particularly for adaptation and loss-and-damage programmes. However, such demands must be accompanied by credible domestic climate policies and transparent implementation frameworks.
The human dimension of climate change must equally receive greater attention. Poor households, rural farmers, fishing communities, women and children are often the worst affected by environmental disasters, despite contributing least to the problem. Government’s climate policies must therefore prioritise vulnerable populations and ensure that the transition towards a green economy does not create additional economic hardship.
There is also an urgent need to involve young Nigerians in climate action. Through environmental education, research, innovation and green entrepreneurship, young people can become important contributors to the country’s sustainable development ambitions.
Ultimately, Nigeria must recognise that climate change is not merely an environmental issue. It is an economic, social, developmental and national security challenge. The destruction of agricultural livelihoods, displacement of communities and competition over increasingly scarce natural resources can deepen poverty and social instability.
As COP31 progresses in Antalya, the Federal Government must ensure that Nigeria’s participation goes beyond diplomatic speeches and the presentation of ambitious proposals. The country must return with concrete agreements, investment opportunities and practical strategies that can be implemented at home.
The Federal Government should establish clear implementation targets, strengthen environmental regulatory institutions, improve coordination among the three tiers of government and ensure that climate policies are backed by adequate funding. The National Council on Climate Change must also be empowered to monitor progress and hold relevant institutions accountable.
Nigeria cannot afford to treat climate change as a distant threat or an issue to be discussed only during international conferences. Its consequences are already visible in the country’s farms, rivers, forests, cities and coastal communities.
COP31 must therefore serve as a turning point in Nigeria’s environmental governance. The country must move from promises to performance, from policy declarations to practical implementation and from dependence on fossil fuels towards a more diversified and sustainable energy future.
The time for climate rhetoric is over. What Nigeria needs now is determined leadership, responsible environmental management, international cooperation and sustained investment in a climate-resilient economy. The future of millions of Nigerians, particularly generations yet unborn, depends on the decisions and actions taken today.
Editorial
EDITORIAL: Harnessing Nigeria’s IT strength in building a formidable economy

Nigeria must move beyond celebrating its growing technological potential to strategically deploying information technology as a major driver of economic transformation, industrial
growth and national prosperity.
Nigeria stands at a critical point in its economic development, where the effective deployment of Information Technology (IT) could determine its capacity to compete favourably in the global economy. With a large youthful population, a growing pool of technology talents, an expanding telecommunications industry and an increasingly vibrant digital entrepreneurship ecosystem, the country possesses considerable advantages that could be harnessed to build a formidable economy.
Unfortunately, these advantages remain largely underexploited. While several countries are using technological innovation to accelerate industrialisation, improve productivity, create employment and strengthen their economic competitiveness, Nigeria is yet to fully translate its IT potential into sustainable economic prosperity.
The country’s technology ecosystem has recorded remarkable growth in recent years. The emergence of indigenous fintech companies, digital payment platforms, software development enterprises, e-commerce businesses and technology-driven startups demonstrates that Nigerians possess the creativity and technical capacity to compete on the international stage.
The success of companies such as Flutterwave, Paystack and Interswitch illustrates how innovation can transform financial transactions, facilitate commerce and expand economic opportunities. These developments have also demonstrated that technology is no longer merely a supporting instrument of economic activities but a critical component of modern economic growth.
However, the challenge before Nigeria is how to move beyond isolated technological successes and build a comprehensive digital economy capable of transforming agriculture, manufacturing, education, healthcare, transportation, security and public administration.
For a country aspiring to become a major African economic powerhouse, this transformation cannot be postponed.
One of the most important areas requiring government attention is digital infrastructure. Reliable electricity, affordable broadband internet, extensive fibre-optic networks and efficient telecommunications services are fundamental to technological development. It is difficult to build a competitive digital economy in an environment where businesses struggle with unstable electricity, expensive internet services and inadequate connectivity.
The Federal Government must therefore prioritise investments in digital infrastructure, particularly in rural communities and underserved areas. Expanding broadband penetration will not only improve communication but also create opportunities for remote employment, online education, digital commerce and technology-driven businesses.
Equally important is the development of human capital. Nigeria’s youthful population represents an enormous economic asset, but this advantage could become a liability if millions of young people remain inadequately equipped with the skills required by the modern economy.
Government, educational institutions and the private sector must collaborate to make digital literacy, coding, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, robotics, data analytics and software development integral components of the country’s educational and vocational training systems.
There is also an urgent need to reform the educational curriculum to reflect the realities of a technology-driven global economy. Producing graduates whose qualifications are disconnected from the demands of the labour market will only deepen unemployment and underemployment.
Furthermore, Nigeria must create an enabling environment for technology entrepreneurs and startups. Access to affordable financing, favourable taxation, regulatory stability and adequate protection of intellectual property rights are essential to encouraging innovation.
Many promising Nigerian technology entrepreneurs struggle to expand their businesses because of limited access to capital, inconsistent government policies and the high cost of doing business. The government must address these obstacles through deliberate policies that encourage indigenous innovation and attract both local and foreign investments.
The Nigerian financial technology sector has already demonstrated the transformative capacity of digital innovation. However, similar achievements must be replicated in agriculture, manufacturing and other productive sectors.
For instance, technology can help farmers access weather information, improve agricultural productivity, identify markets and obtain financial services. In manufacturing, automation and digital production systems can reduce operational costs, improve product quality and enhance competitiveness. In healthcare, telemedicine and digital health records can improve access to medical services, particularly in underserved communities.
Nigeria must also recognise the enormous economic opportunities presented by artificial intelligence. Although the technology is still evolving, its applications in business administration, education, agriculture, financial services, healthcare and industrial production are increasingly significant.
The country should develop a national artificial intelligence framework that encourages responsible innovation, protects citizens’ data and prepares Nigerian businesses and workers for the changing demands of the global economy.
Another critical consideration is the need to strengthen cybersecurity and data protection. As more economic activities migrate to digital platforms, the risks associated with cybercrime, financial fraud, identity theft and data breaches will increase. Without adequate safeguards, public confidence in the digital economy could be undermined.
The government must strengthen regulatory institutions, improve cybersecurity infrastructure and promote public awareness of digital safety.
Beyond these measures, Nigeria must deliberately position itself as a destination for global technology investments. The country’s large consumer market, entrepreneurial population and strategic location within Africa provide opportunities to attract technology companies seeking to expand their operations across the continent.
However, attracting these investments requires policy consistency, institutional transparency, economic stability and an efficient business environment.
The government must equally address the persistent problem of brain drain in the technology sector. It is regrettable that many highly skilled Nigerian technology professionals seek opportunities abroad because of better remuneration, infrastructure and working conditions.
While Nigerians should be free to pursue opportunities anywhere in the world, government must create conditions that make the country attractive for technology professionals to establish businesses, develop innovations and transfer knowledge.
There is also a compelling need to deploy IT in improving governance. Digitalisation of public services can reduce bureaucratic bottlenecks, improve revenue collection, promote transparency and minimise opportunities for corruption.
Government institutions should embrace technology in procurement, tax administration, public records management and service delivery.
Nevertheless, the development of Nigeria’s digital economy must not be concentrated in major cities alone. Rural communities, small businesses, women and economically disadvantaged groups must be included in the country’s digital transformation agenda. Otherwise, the technology revolution could widen existing economic inequalities.
Ultimately, Nigeria’s ambition to build a formidable economy cannot be realised through dependence on crude oil and other traditional sources of revenue alone. The future belongs increasingly to economies that invest in knowledge, innovation, technology and human capital.
The Federal Government must therefore move beyond policy pronouncements and translate its digital economy ambitions into measurable programmes with clear implementation timelines. State governments, the private sector, universities and technology entrepreneurs must also become active partners in this national project.
Nigeria has the talent, population, entrepreneurial spirit and market potential to become one of Africa’s leading technology-driven economies. What is required is visionary leadership, strategic investment, policy consistency and the political will to turn these advantages into tangible economic benefits.
The time has come for Nigeria to stop treating Information Technology as a peripheral sector and begin recognising it as a central pillar of national economic development. Harnessing the country’s IT strength is not merely about embracing modern technology; it is about creating jobs, stimulating industrial growth, diversifying the economy, improving productivity and securing prosperity for future generations.
A Nigeria that successfully harnesses its technological potential will be better positioned to compete globally, create wealth domestically and build the formidable economy its citizens deserve.
Editorial
EDITORIAL: Sanitising Nigeria’s Power Sector: The urgent need to end corruption, inefficiency and exploitation

Nigeria’s electricity sector has remained one of the most troubling examples of institutional failure, corruption and policy inconsistency in the country. Despite successive governments spending enormous sums of public money on power sector reforms, the country continues to grapple with epileptic electricity supply, frequent grid collapses, inflated electricity bills, poor service delivery and the persistent exploitation of consumers. This unfortunate situation raises fundamental questions about the management, accountability and integrity of the sector.
For a country with a population exceeding 200 million people and enormous economic potential, Nigeria’s inability to provide stable and affordable electricity is not only embarrassing but also economically damaging. Industries are shutting down or relocating, small businesses are struggling to survive, hospitals are forced to depend on alternative power sources, and households are spending an increasing proportion of their incomes on petrol and diesel to generate electricity. The power sector, which should be a catalyst for economic development, has instead become a major obstacle to national productivity.
There is, therefore, an urgent need to sanitise the sector and address the deep-rooted problems undermining its performance.
One of the greatest challenges confronting Nigeria’s electricity industry is the apparent lack of transparency and accountability among some of its operators. Since the privatisation of the power sector in 2013, expectations were high that private-sector participation would improve efficiency, attract investment and guarantee reliable electricity supply. Unfortunately, more than a decade after the exercise, the expected transformation remains largely elusive.
The privatisation process itself has continued to attract criticism over the capacity, competence and financial preparedness of some investors who acquired electricity distribution and generation companies. While it would be unfair to blame every failure in the sector on the private operators, the government must critically examine whether the objectives of privatisation have been achieved.
It is unacceptable that electricity distribution companies (DisCos) continue to demand higher tariffs from consumers while failing to provide electricity commensurate with the payments demanded. Consumers are regularly confronted with estimated billing, arbitrary charges, poor metering arrangements and inadequate responses to complaints. This practice must not be allowed to continue.
The Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) must demonstrate greater determination in enforcing regulations and protecting consumers. Regulatory institutions should not exist merely to issue licences, announce tariff adjustments and make policy statements. Their primary responsibility must include ensuring that electricity operators deliver quality services, maintain transparency and account for their operations.
Furthermore, the activities of electricity generation companies (GenCos), transmission operators and distribution companies must be subjected to regular independent performance assessments. Operators that consistently fail to meet their contractual obligations should face appropriate sanctions, while those demonstrating efficiency and improved service delivery should receive the necessary incentives.
Another critical issue requiring urgent attention is the persistent collapse of the national electricity grid. Repeated grid disturbances expose the weaknesses of Nigeria’s transmission infrastructure and the failure to make adequate investments in modern equipment. Government must prioritise the rehabilitation and expansion of transmission facilities, strengthen the national grid and accelerate the development of alternative electricity distribution arrangements.
The problem of corruption and financial mismanagement must also be confronted. The power sector has consumed enormous public resources through interventions, bailouts, subsidies and other financial commitments. Yet, Nigerians continue to experience inadequate electricity supply. Government must commission comprehensive independent audits of public funds allocated to the sector and ensure that every naira spent produces measurable results.
Equally disturbing is the problem of electricity theft, illegal connections and vandalism of power infrastructure. These activities contribute to revenue losses and undermine the financial sustainability of the industry. However, enforcement must be balanced with public education, affordable access and improved customer service. Consumers cannot reasonably be expected to fulfil their financial obligations when operators fail to provide reliable services.
The ongoing electricity reforms under the Electricity Act 2023 also present an opportunity to address some of these challenges. The law provides a framework for greater participation by state governments in electricity generation, transmission and distribution within their jurisdictions. This decentralisation should be properly implemented to encourage investment, competition and innovative solutions to Nigeria’s electricity crisis.
Nevertheless, decentralisation must not become another avenue for political patronage, regulatory confusion and financial exploitation. State governments seeking to participate in the electricity market must demonstrate the technical and financial capacity to manage their responsibilities effectively.
There is also an urgent need to encourage renewable energy investment, particularly solar power, mini-grids and other alternative sources. Nigeria cannot continue to depend excessively on an unreliable national grid when millions of citizens remain without access to dependable electricity. A diversified energy mix would help improve electricity access, particularly in rural communities and underserved areas.
However, the most important requirement for sanitising the sector is political will. Successive administrations have announced ambitious electricity reforms without demonstrating sufficient commitment to addressing the fundamental problems. Government must be prepared to confront powerful interests, expose financial irregularities and hold influential individuals and institutions accountable, irrespective of their political connections.
The National Assembly also has an important responsibility to strengthen legislative oversight of the sector. Public hearings, independent investigations and regular reviews of the activities of electricity operators should become meaningful instruments for ensuring accountability rather than political exercises.
Above all, consumers must be treated as important stakeholders rather than helpless sources of revenue. There should be transparent billing systems, adequate metering, effective complaint-resolution mechanisms and compensation for consumers who suffer prolonged service failures in accordance with applicable regulations.
Nigeria’s power sector cannot be sanitised through cosmetic reforms, tariff increases or political declarations. It requires a fundamental restructuring of the industry’s governance, financial management and operational standards.
The Federal Government must therefore rise to the challenge by initiating a comprehensive review of the sector, strengthening regulatory institutions, investigating allegations of corruption, enforcing contractual obligations and ensuring that electricity operators are held accountable for their performance.
Nigerians have endured years of darkness, economic hardship and unfulfilled promises. They deserve an electricity system that works, not one that continuously demands more money while delivering less service.
The time has come to end the culture of impunity, inefficiency and exploitation in the power sector. Until transparency, accountability and competence become the guiding principles of the industry, Nigeria’s quest for stable electricity will remain an elusive dream.
A functional power sector is not a luxury; it is the foundation of industrial growth, economic prosperity and national development. Government must act decisively before the crisis inflicts even greater damage on the nation’s economy.
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration must demonstrate the political courage to confront the powerful interests that have held Nigeria’s electricity sector hostage for decades. The Federal Government cannot continue to spend public funds on interventions, announce new reforms and increase electricity tariffs without demanding corresponding improvements in service delivery.
Nigerians deserve to know how much public money has been committed to the sector, what results have been achieved and who should be held accountable for persistent failures.
NERC must also rise above regulatory complacency and demonstrate that it has the authority, independence and determination to discipline erring operators. Electricity distribution companies that consistently fail to meet their obligations should not be allowed to hide behind excuses while imposing questionable bills and demanding higher payments from frustrated consumers. Where necessary, government must review the ownership, management and operational arrangements of companies that have demonstrated persistent incapacity.
The National Assembly, on its part, must intensify its oversight responsibilities and ensure that investigations into the sector’s financial and operational failures produce concrete consequences. Those found culpable of corruption, financial recklessness or abuse of public resources must be made to face the law, regardless of their political or economic influence.
More importantly, government must stop treating electricity as a privilege that Nigerians should struggle to purchase at exorbitant costs. Reliable electricity is fundamental to economic development and the welfare of citizens. A country that cannot guarantee stable power cannot realistically aspire to industrialisation, job creation and sustainable economic growth.
The Tinubu administration must therefore make the sanitisation of the power sector a national priority. It must move beyond rhetoric and embark on a transparent, measurable and uncompromising reform programme that restores public confidence in the industry.
Nigeria cannot continue to operate in darkness while those entrusted with managing its electricity sector enjoy the benefits of a system that has failed millions of citizens. The time for excuses is over. The time for accountability, genuine reforms and reliable electricity is now.
-
General News1 month agoRivers 2027: We are not part of Rainbow Coalition – APC Legacy Group slams Wike, Fubara meeting
-
Politics2 months ago2027: ASAF backs APC governors, rejects rainbow coalition
-
General News2 months ago
JOHESU demands: MHWUN puts FG on notice over fresh action
-
Politics2 months agoYou have demonstrated diligence, loyalty, statesmanship in leadership, Ekechi salutes Shetimma at 60
-
Politics3 months ago2027: Advertising experts raise concerns over irregular regulation of sectorÂ
-
FCT News3 months ago
2027: Hasana-Moneme pledges skills, empowerment, credit access for FCT women
-
General News3 months ago
2027: Dame Princess Esom-Nwafor Orizu confirmed as APC flagbearer for Nnewi North /South /Ekwusigo Federal Constituency as INEC releases names of candidates
-
Uncategorized4 months ago
Rescue of Oyo schoolchilden: Tinubu commends security agencies, says action breakthrough in fight against criminality
